Supporting the SDGs

Opportunities and Challenges

The Company is committed to operating in accordance with good corporate governance principles and recognizes the importance of sustainable supply chain management to achieve optimal efficiency while considering economic, social, and environmental impacts throughout the Value Chain. The Company promotes Green Procurement and supports the selection of suppliers that conduct business responsibly and transparently and comply with standards on human rights, occupational health and safety, and environmental management.

The Company faces challenges arising from climate change, increasingly stringent environmental regulations, and stakeholder expectations regarding sustainable practices at every stage of the supply chain. Some suppliers may not yet possess sufficient knowledge, management systems, or comprehensive ESG practices, affecting their ability to effectively assess and manage environmental, social, and governance risks within the supply chain. In addition, fluctuations in raw material, energy, and transportation costs may affect business continuity and the Company’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets.

Nevertheless, the Company recognizes opportunities to enhance its supply chain management by systematically integrating ESG principles into its procurement and supplier management processes. It focuses on building supplier capabilities, raising sustainability awareness, establishing supplier assessment criteria covering environmental, social, and business ethics issues, and continuously monitoring and evaluating supplier performance. These efforts help reduce supply chain risks and strengthen long-term competitiveness.

In addition, the Company seeks to promote collaboration with business partners in developing environmentally friendly products and services, increasing the proportion of low-carbon products and services procured, and applying technology and innovation to enhance operational efficiency. These efforts support the Net Zero target, create shared value for stakeholders, and strengthen the Company’s image as a socially and environmentally responsible organization, thereby creating business opportunities, attracting investors, and supporting sustainable growth in the future.

Targets and Performance

Critical Tier 1 Suppliers undergo an ESG Self-Assessment.
Targets
%
Performance
General Administration employees responsible for procurement attend ESG training and pass the assessment.
Targets
At least
%
Performance
Critical Tier 1 Suppliers underwent an On-Site Audit.
Performance
%
Suppliers representing
Performance
%
of all suppliers underwent Supplier Risk Screening for ESG risks.
new suppliers passed the sustainability screening.
Performance
%
critical suppliers signed an acknowledgment of compliance with the Business Supplier Code of Conduct.
Performance
%

Strategy and Management Approach

The Company recognizes the importance of suppliers and the supply chain as key mechanisms affecting business continuity, operational quality, and sustainable shared value creation. It therefore seeks to manage its supply chain efficiently, transparently, and accountably in accordance with good corporate governance principles, while considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) impacts throughout the value chain.

The Company has established supplier selection and assessment guidelines that consider quality, operational standards, business ethics, environmental management, human rights, occupational health and safety, as well as suppliers’ ability to manage risks and adapt to climate change. ESG issues are also systematically integrated into procurement and supplier management processes.

In addition, the Company has developed the “BCPG Supplier Code of Conduct” as a common framework for the Company and its suppliers. The Code covers business ethics, legal compliance, human rights, labor practices, occupational health and safety, environmental management, and anti-corruption, with the aim of enhancing suppliers’ operating standards throughout the supply chain.

The Company has developed its supplier management process using Supplier Risk Screening, ESG Supplier Self-Assessments, and Supplier On-Site Audits for critical or high-risk suppliers to ensure that their operations align with the Company’s guidelines. During the year, the Company conducted on-site audits of six suppliers.

The Company also places importance on building supplier capabilities and fostering collaboration through Supplier Conferences and knowledge-sharing activities. These initiatives promote sustainable supply chain management, Green Procurement, and the development of environmentally friendly product and service innovations. They also help enhance operational efficiency, reduce climate-related risks, and support the Company’s long-term Net Zero target. Further information on the BCPG Supplier Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website.

Supplier Classification Criteria

The Company has developed a sustainable supply chain management process by classifying suppliers that manufacture and distribute products or provide services. This classification enables the Company to assess their significance and potential risks to business operations and to establish appropriate supplier management approaches based on the risk level and significance of each supplier group.

The Company has established criteria for classifying critical suppliers into two groups: Critical Tier 1 Suppliers and Critical Non-Tier 1 Suppliers that do not conduct business directly with the Company. This classification supports efficient and transparent supply chain management aligned with sustainable business practices, as detailed below:

Criteria for Identifying Suppliers Critical to the Company
Suppliers with a high procurement value under contract or those supplying critical equipment and components for power generation processes and infrastructure businesses.
Suppliers essential to the Company’s business operations, such as suppliers of raw materials, power generation equipment, engineering systems, and maintenance services.
Suppliers with limited alternatives or whose products or services cannot be replaced within a short period.

Supplier Management Approach

The Company manages its suppliers and supply chain through a system that enables data integration, performance monitoring, and continuous communication with suppliers. This enhances efficiency, transparency, and responsible business conduct throughout the supply chain. The Company has established its operating approach in alignment with the “BCPG Supplier Code of Conduct,” which covers environmental and social issues, human rights, occupational health and safety, business ethics, and anti-corruption. Suppliers are expected to strictly observe and comply with the Code.

Through systematic supplier management, the Company aims to effectively promote ethical conduct, equality, transparency, and ESG risk management while supporting suppliers in building their capabilities and growing sustainably alongside the Company. The General Administration Department, which is responsible for procurement, oversees the formulation of supplier development plans and approaches. Relevant executives establish the direction, processes, and operating guidelines to ensure that sustainable supply chain management is clearly defined, put into practice, and aligned with the Company’s sustainability goals.

Diagram of the Company’s Supplier Management Approach

Supplier Risk Management
  • Supply chain risk assessment
  • Supply chain value analysis
Supplier Registration
  • Assessment of Supplier Qualifications
  • Registration on the Approved Vendor List (AVL)
Annual Supplier Performance Evaluation
  • Supplier Self-Assessment
  • Supplier Audits Conducted with Relevant Departments

The Company undertakes Supplier Risk Management covering risk assessment, business value analysis, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors that may affect the Company and its stakeholders. The process also includes the classification of critical suppliers to establish appropriate management and monitoring approaches based on each supplier’s risk level.

In addition, the Company maintains an Approved Vendor List (AVL) by assessing the qualifications and suitability of suppliers seeking to conduct business with the Company. The assessment criteria cover technical capabilities, product and service quality, financial standing, legal compliance, environmental standards, occupational health and safety, and human and labor rights principles. This process ensures that suppliers possess the necessary capabilities and can operate in accordance with the Company’s standards.

Once approved and registered, suppliers are required to undergo a Yearly Performance Evaluation using the Vendor/Contractor Evaluation Form. Depending on the risk level and conditions specified by the Company, the evaluation covers an ESG Supplier Self-Assessment and an On-Site Audit to continuously monitor and assess supplier performance.

If a supplier fails to comply with the required standards or receives an assessment result below the specified threshold, the Company may require a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and, as appropriate, consider temporarily suspending procurement from the supplier or permanently removing the supplier from the Company’s Approved Vendor List.

The Company reviews its supplier management approach and processes annually to ensure that its operations align with the BCPG Supplier Code of Conduct, effectively manage and mitigate ESG risks, and support the long-term development of a resilient, transparent, and sustainable supply chain.

ESG Supplier Risk Screening

The Company has established an approach for identifying and assessing supplier risks covering environmental, social, and governance issues. The assessment forms part of its supply chain risk management and helps enhance suppliers’ operating standards in alignment with the Company’s sustainable business practices.

The Company conducts ESG Supplier Risk Screening through the identification, analysis, and prioritization of risks based on their Likelihood and Impact on business operations, supply chain continuity, and the Company’s stakeholders. The assessment draws on information from Supplier Self-Assessments, On-Site Audit results, and suppliers’ historical performance data.

1
Product and Service Risk
Technical performance, product and service quality, delivery, and operational continuity.
2
Business Continuity Risk
Dependence on critical suppliers, the procurement of specialized equipment available from only a limited number of manufacturers or service providers, and supply chain risks.
3
Environmental Risk
Non-compliance with environmental laws and requirements, waste management, resource use, and greenhouse gas emissions.
4
Social and Human Rights Risk
Non-compliance with labor laws and occupational health and safety requirements, human rights violations, discrimination, child labor, and forced labor.
5
Governance and Ethics Risk
Corruption, bribery, transparency in business operations, and non-compliance with applicable laws and requirements.

Supplier Risk Assessment Criteria

Risk Matrix
Risk level* Risk Evaluation
Scores 9 - 16
Very High
Scores 5 - 8
High
Scores 3 - 4
Medium
Scores 1 - 2
Low

Remark: Risk level = Likelihood of occurrence × Severity of impact

Likehood

1 - High Unlikely 2- Unlikely 3 - Possible 4 - Likely
Possibility of existing risks is ≤ 20% Possibility of existing risks is > 20-50% Possibility of existing risks is > 50-80% Possibility of existing risks is > 80%
Unlikely to happen in the current year Possible to happen under specific circumstances Possible to happen in the current year Most likely to happen in the current year
Never happen Rarely happen in the past year Sometimes happen in the past years Regularly happen in the past years
Impact Finance Operation and Workforce Reputation Compliance and Environment
4
Severe
Affect EBITDA, Revenue or PAT > 10%
  • The power plant loses of operational opportunities / experiences a sudden and continuous shutdown of operations > 20 days
  • Disability and fatality from the operation activities
  • The incident led to strong opposition or protests from the public, local communities, or stakeholders
  • Loss of creditability among key stakeholders critical to sustainable business development for > 1 year
  • Termination of employment is ordered upon confirmation of misconduct
  • A personal data breach or leakage occurred, which may seriously impact the rights and freedoms of data subjects, resulting in liability under the Personal Data Protection Act
  • Severe pollution and/or environmental damages to both inside and outside operation sites
3
High
Affect EBITDA, Revenue or PAT > 5%-10%
  • The power plant loses of operational opportunities / experiences a sudden and continuous shutdown of operations > 10-20 days
  • Severe injury from the operation activities, resulting in operational halt for > 90 days
  • The incident led to unsatisfaction from stakeholders through complaints and whistle blowing report, leading to negotiation and remendability
  • Loss of creditability among key stakeholders critical to sustainable business development for > 1-12 months
  • An order for removal from responsibilities will be issued upon confirmation of wrongdoing
  • A personal data breach or leakage occurred, which may seriously impact the rights and freedoms of data subjects, resulting in lawsuits from the personal data owner and/or external stakeholders
  • Pollutions that negatively affect environments to both inside and outside operation sites
2
Medium
Affect EBITDA, Revenue or PAT > 1%-5%
  • The power plant loses of operational opportunities / experiences a sudden and continuous shutdown of operations > 2-10 days
  • Severe injury from the operation activities, resulting in operational halt for 90 days
  • The incident led to unsatisfaction from stakeholders, leading to request for the Company to clarify
  • Loss of creditability among key stakeholders critical to sustainable business development for > 1 week – 1 month
  • Verbal and written warnings are issued upon confirmation of misconduct
  • A personal data breach or leakage occurred, which may seriously impact the rights and freedoms of data subjects, however, there are no leakage of sensitive data
  • Pollutions that negatively affect environments to both inside and outside operation sites
1
Low
Affect EBITDA, Revenue or PAT ≤1%
  • The power plant loses of operational opportunities / experiences a sudden and continuous shutdown of operations ≤ 2 days
  • Severe injury from the operation activities, resulting in operational halt < 90 days
  • The incident led to unsatisfaction from stakeholders, but the Company can contain the damages
  • Loss of creditability among key stakeholders critical to sustainable business development for ≤ 1 week
  • Investigation are issued upon confirmation of misconduct
  • A personal data breach or leakage occurred with little or none negative impacts to the data subjects
  • Leakage or pollution that are needed to be announced but with little or none environmental negative impacts
Supplier Risk Screening Results
New Suppliers
all suppliers underwent ESG Risk Screening
representing
%
Critical Tier 1 Suppliers were identified as
having sustainability risks.
Critical Tier 1 Suppliers were identified as high-risk suppliers
The main risks concerned product and service quality management and dependence on a single supplier for specialized equipment.
The Company identified no suppliers with significant negative environmental, social, or governance impacts.

The Company uses the risk assessment results to establish supplier management approaches, monitor supplier performance, and determine appropriate risk mitigation measures. These include monitoring Corrective Action Plans (CAPs), conducting additional audits, and building supplier capabilities to strengthen supply chain resilience and reduce potential long-term ESG impacts on the Company and its stakeholders.

Supplier Assessment

The Company annually monitors and assesses critical suppliers’ compliance with the BCPG Supplier Code of Conduct, covering environmental, social, and governance issues. This process encourages suppliers to conduct business responsibly and transparently in alignment with the Company’s sustainable business practices.

The Company assesses its Critical Tier 1 Suppliers through On-Site Audits, Supplier Self-Assessments, and ESG performance monitoring to evaluate their business standing, operational capabilities, and compliance with the Company’s sustainability criteria.

Criteria for Selecting Suppliers for Assessment

1
Critical Tier 1 Suppliers, particularly those supplying materials, equipment, and services related to power generation processes and infrastructure businesses.
2
Suppliers with a contract or procurement value of THB 1 million or more.
3
Suppliers exposed to environmental, social, and governance risks (ESG Risks) or critical to business continuity.
4
Suppliers that have consented to the assessment.

The annual supplier assessment comprises the following six criteria:

Supplier Assessment Criteria Supplier Assessment Details
1. Management Responsibilities and Code of Conduct
  • Availability of requirements or operating principles for production operations.
  • The supplier’s assignment of responsible persons to oversee its operations.
  • Contingency plans for addressing service quality issues.
  • Training plans and programs to develop employees’ knowledge and skills.
2. Product and Service Quality Management
  • Ability to deliver in accordance with the scope of work specified in the Terms of Reference (TOR).
  • Plans for controlling and inspecting products and services at every stage.
  • Clear assignment of responsible persons for production or service delivery.
  • The supplier’s ability to continuously improve and develop its structures and programs through approaches such as Kaizen, Lean, and Six Sigma.
3. Production Process Control (Applicable Only to the Procurement of Goods)
  • The supplier’s implementation of preventive maintenance.
  • The supplier’s use of production process control tools, such as process flowcharts and process control plans.
  • The supplier’s ability to adjust or increase production capacity in response to demand.
  • The supplier’s compliance with FIFO or other production procedures and its sound operating performance.
4. Supply Chain Management
  • The supplier’s establishment of a supply chain management policy and clear assignment of responsibilities.
  • The supplier’s implementation of cost-reduction policies or programs.
5. Product and Service Delivery and Customer Responsibility
  • The supplier’s ability to deliver products and services in accordance with the agreed terms.
  • The supplier’s effectiveness in reporting identified product and service quality issues.
  • The supplier’s plans to monitor customer complaint trends and promptly implement corrective and preventive actions.
6. Safety and Environment
  • The supplier’s policies on waste segregation or waste reduction.
  • The supplier’s policies requiring the use of personal protective equipment while working in production areas.
  • The supplier’s environmental policies comply with applicable requirements.
  • The supplier holds ISO 14001 certification or an equivalent standard.
  • The supplier has effective systems in place for maintaining project and/or office areas.

Supplier Assessment Results

Supplier Assessment Results
Critical Tier 1 Suppliers underwent On-Site Audits.
identified through the assessment as having significant negative environmental, social, or governance impacts.
suppliers
significant negative impacts were undergoing corrective action.
suppliers
their contracts with the Company terminated due to significant negative impacts.
suppliers
Supplier Capability Development Results
received support on corrective action approaches and ESG capability development.
suppliers
(because no significant risks or negative impacts were identified through the assessment)

Approaches to Supplier Corrective Action and Development

The Company has established corrective action and development approaches for suppliers assessed as being exposed to environmental, social, and governance risks. Examples of these approaches are as follows:

Product and Service Quality Management Environment and Safety
  • Where risks arise from procuring specialized products or services from a limited number of suppliers, the Company may allow more time to identify suppliers, plan procurement in advance, and consider an appropriate bidding method. These measures help maintain supply chain continuity and reduce the risk of dependence on a single supplier.
  • Where product or service quality risks or technical issues arise, the Company inspects product quality and work performance against the prescribed standards. It also closely monitors warranty terms, insurance coverage, and corrective and improvement actions undertaken jointly with the supplier.
  • Where a supplier is at risk of non-compliance with environmental laws, labor laws, occupational health and safety requirements, or human rights principles, the Company communicates with, provides guidance to, and enhances the supplier’s knowledge and understanding to raise its awareness of the issues identified.
  • The Company reviews suppliers’ backgrounds and qualifications before registering them on the Approved Vendor List (AVL) and closely monitors suppliers exposed to environmental and social risks.
  • For suppliers with issues requiring improvement, the Company may establish corrective action plans and jointly monitor their implementation with the suppliers to enhance ESG operating standards and reduce risks that may affect the Company and its stakeholders.
  • The Company encourages suppliers to apply environmental, safety, and business ethics practices in their operations to support the long-term development of a sustainable supply chain.

Employee Capability Development

In addition to systematic supplier management, the Company places importance on developing the capabilities of personnel responsible for supply chain management and procurement, particularly in sustainability-related areas. This aims to enhance their knowledge, skills, and capabilities in supply chain management in alignment with the Company’s sustainable business practices.

The Company aims to enhance the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) knowledge and understanding of General Administration personnel and employees responsible for procurement. It also equips them to apply sustainability concepts when making decisions on sourcing, procurement, and supplier management. This supports business engagement with suppliers that operate transparently and ethically and appropriately address human rights, social responsibility, and environmental management.

In addition, the Company promotes employee capability development to enable personnel to adapt to trends and changes in the energy sector, as well as evolving stakeholder expectations, laws, and relevant sustainability standards.

In 2025, the Company developed the capabilities of General Administration personnel and employees responsible for procurement through training and activities covering ESG and sustainable supply chain management. These initiatives aimed to raise sustainability awareness and promote the effective application of acquired knowledge in procurement processes.

Key Stakeholders

Employees
  • Promoted employee knowledge and capabilities in sustainable procurement and ESG-based supply chain management through training and related activities.
  • Developed a transparent supply chain management system aligned with good governance principles, including the management of ESG risks throughout the supply chain.
  • Provided a good and safe working environment as a foundation, together with healthcare support to enhance employee satisfaction.
  • Emphasized greenhouse gas emissions reduction and efficient resource use, encouraging employee participation in sustainability initiatives such as reducing energy consumption and using recycled materials.
Suppliers
  • Conducted annual Supplier Self-Assessments and On-Site Audits to enhance ESG performance standards and reduce supply chain risks.
  • Organized meetings, seminars, and Supplier Conference activities to strengthen suppliers’ knowledge, understanding, and capabilities in sustainable business practices.
  • Encouraged suppliers to comply with human rights, occupational health and safety, and business ethics principles throughout the supply chain.
  • Collaborated with suppliers to develop environmentally friendly innovations, products, and services to enhance operational efficiency and create sustainable shared value.